requestId:684d91173a3657.53297587.
The history of the indecisive mortality
———Article question of Yu Yingshi
Author: Tang Wenming
Source: The author authorized the Confucian network to publish, original article “Qinghua Philosophy 2003”
Baocai Sweetheart NetworkOriginal title: The history of the indecisive mortality
Wiber’s wordsInclusive contract, Confucian ethics hindered the development of capitalism in China in the late age, while the new teaching ethics provided some energy for the development of capitalism in Western Europe. At first glance, Professor Yu Yingjun has several technology companies. Teacher Ye has obtained the topic of the famous book “Chinese Late Religious Ethics and Businessman’s Energy” that is consistent with Wei Bo’s “New Educational Ethics and Capitalist Spirit”, and is almost a clear article about Wei Bo’s words that have been written by Wei Bo. But according to Yu Yingjun’s self-report, he only regarded Veber’s view as the “Germination of Capitalism” under the influence of the huge historical view of Marxism as two external stories of his research. In this way, he divided the Weber problem and the Weber style problem in a step-by-step manner. In his opinion, it is “unsuitable” to propose the so-called “With why China did not produce capitalism” because it means that setting capitalism is a historical necessity of any society, just as the “Germinal Proposition of Capitalism” also requires the same rules for historical development.
Although history also expresses the will to seek truth in intellectual theory, it also focuses on the preset of the theoretical argument. But for historical research, any theoretical preset must bear the certain judgment, and it can even be a false bed of Protrastes. Historians start by preventing the iron gangsters from becoming theoretical and preventing theory from making a dissertation of historical experiences in advance, but rather, they should develop from the experience of experience, and make an objective explanation of the causes and consequences of historical events and the coming of the dragon. There is a suspicion of reasoning first when raising a question about Chinese history. Such a problem is just baoqing proposed that the next thing can be argued as long as it is cut or even virtual experience. Therefore, Yu Yingshi pointed out that Veber’s viewpoint should be expressed in the initiating meaning of Chinese historical research, and “Verbo-style questions” should be raised separately based on China’s unique historical experience. Specifically, the Ming and Qing dynasties’ international situation should be expressed. In Chinese society, the rise of the merchant level is an uncontested historical fact. So, the question is that the businessman’s mental structure and energy development is: what is the world, level of self-consciousness, and value awareness of these merchants? Considering the energy resources that merchants could gain at that time, especially those provided by religious ethics, we can further ask: Can the ethics concepts of the Confucianism, the three religions of Taoism in China be promoted to the development of business in the Ming and Qing Dynasties? href=”http://twsugarnews.com/”>Baohan’s influence? After some assessment, Yu Yingshi believed that it seemed that the Protestantism developed a new ethical concept of “advancement into the world”. href=”https://twhugdating.org/”>Breeding meaningChinese religion since the Tang Dynasty also had a “transition into the world”, so the problem turned into: what is the relationship between the transition of religion in the Middle Tang Dynasty and the serious development of business since the 16th century?
Whether it is about Confucianism for Veber彩彩下载’s discourse on ethics, or the views that Yu Yingshi had in this research, are all in the academic world. Among them, what has always been gathered is a question with a strong sense of reality: it is called. Can Confucian ethics hinder the development of capitalism in terms of the purpose of theory? Most of the views tend to overturn Veber’s conclusions, regardless of the basis and origin of the arguments For example, some socialists seek evidence from the economic prosperity of the “Four Asian Dragons” in the Confucian civilization circle, while others philosophers directly argue it from the perspective of theory. There is always a confusion in this problem, but it is not There are two different problems and judgments. When Vaber was studying the relationship between Protestantism or Confucianism ethics and capitalist energy, what he did was an experience of historical society. The question he raised was a historical society problem, and he concluded Bao Haimei‘s conclusion is an explanation of an experience of historical events that have occurred—whether he said that the New Education ethics promoted the development of capitalism, or said Confucius’ ethics hinder the development of capitalism, and are all empirical judgments about history. But if we abstractly propose whether Confucius’ ethics hinder the development of capitalism, it is a philosophical problem. Any conclusions and judgments made are philosophical theoretical judgments. HistoriansThe former is always the former rather than the latter. Dividing these two issues and judgments helps us prevent unstoppable storms into some unwanted disputes. But what is more wonderful is that when Veber explained the relationship between the development of the New Educational Ethics and the development of Western European capitalism, he was making some explanations of the historical events that had already occurred; but when he said that Confucian ethics hindered the development of the capitalism in China, he was making some explanations of the capable things that had never happened. Although Vibo’s discourse on Confucian ethics hinders the development of capitalism is a historical and social judgment, he is willing to do things that have never happened. href=”https://twsweetdiary.org/honeydating/%e5%be%9e%e6%af%8f%e5%80%8b%e6%9c%88%e7%b5%a6%e6%88%9120%e8%90%ac%e7%9a%84daddy%e8%ae%8a%e6%88%90%e6%88%91%e7%9a%84%e8%80%81%e5%85%ac/”>The female college student care club is essentially a theoretical statement or a theoretical judgment. In other words, Veber’s view actually transcends the model of experience and research, but has made some theoretical statements.
In history research, there is no complete and unreasonable judgment. As long as historians do, they always have to set their own experience. Yu Yingshi also pointed out that this “difficult in mode theory” is broad, and Wei Bo is naturally no exception. Yu Yingshi also once suggested that Veber’s “fantasy” research and development methods can have potential contradictions with the experience standpoint recognized by ordinary history. In fact, history research should not only be wary of the consequences of theory first, but also cannot be dispelled, and even make theoretical judgments at a very large level. So our conclusion is that history research must bear the burden of judgments brought about by the use of theoretical judgments. From the source of the word, the final meaning of “historia” in ancient Greek is exactly “exploration”. History research is a theoretical discussion activity for seeking knowledge in history, rather than just a empirical account of old events. In philosophy, Vabe was greatly influenced by Kant, so we have some people who say that Vabe’s “fantasy” research and discussion purpose is actually a comprehensive judgment of Kant’s meaning. If you want to ask how historical knowledge can be sufficient in a philosophical attitude, then Vaber will definitely give a Kant 平台彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩The structure of knowledge includes both rational materials given by the object of experience and the standardized talents of the intellectual subject. Rather than saying that historical research is “difficulty in mode theory” in the vast air, it is better to say that there is a need for historical knowledge in the historical knowledge activity: lack of experience data, of course, it cannot form any historical knowledge; the direct consequence of lack of model talents is that it cannot make appropriate judgments on historical events, that is, it cannot form historical knowledge, and 官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩�
If historians want to accept Kant’s intellectual theory, then they need to start by assuming a history as “things are self-organized”. In this meaning, recently, a knowledge competition program with a doctoral protagonist is very popular. It will be forever secret, and is essentially unknown. Historical knowledge can only be a kind of insight into the body of a mobile object of history, and what can be seen through can never be the absolute historical essence of meaning.
Kant still adheres to the certainty of knowledge. In his thinking system, tru
發佈留言